[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20080506153943.AC69.KOSAKI.MOTOHIRO@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date: Tue, 06 May 2008 15:43:39 +0900
From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
To: balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc: kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com,
Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@...com>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: on CONFIG_MM_OWNER=y, kernel panic is possible.
> > #ifdef CONFIG_MM_OWNER
> > - struct task_struct *owner; /* The thread group leader that */
> > - /* owns the mm_struct. */
> > + struct task_struct *owner; /* point to one of task that owns the mm_struct. */
> > #endif
> >
> > #ifdef CONFIG_PROC_FS
>
> How about just, the task that owns the mm_struct? One of, implies multiple owners.
Ah, below is better?
/* point to any one of task that related the mm_struct. */
my intention is only remove "thread group leader" word.
other things, I obey your favor.
Cheers!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists