[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6599ad830805062037n221ef8e2n9ee7ac33417ab499@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 6 May 2008 20:37:50 -0700
From: "Paul Menage" <menage@...gle.com>
To: "KOSAKI Motohiro" <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
"Lee Schermerhorn" <Lee.Schermerhorn@...com>,
"KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki" <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: on CONFIG_MM_OWNER=y, kernel panic is possible.
On Mon, May 5, 2008 at 11:43 PM, KOSAKI Motohiro
<kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com> wrote:
> > > #ifdef CONFIG_MM_OWNER
> > > - struct task_struct *owner; /* The thread group leader that */
> > > - /* owns the mm_struct. */
> > > + struct task_struct *owner; /* point to one of task that owns the mm_struct. */
> > > #endif
> > >
> > > #ifdef CONFIG_PROC_FS
> >
> > How about just, the task that owns the mm_struct? One of, implies multiple owners.
>
> Ah, below is better?
>
> /* point to any one of task that related the mm_struct. */
I'd word it as
/*
* "owner" points to a task that is regarded as the canonical
* user/owner of this mm. All of the following must be true in
* order for it to be changed:
*
* current == mm->owner
* current->mm != mm
* new_owner->mm == mm
* new_owner->alloc_lock is held
*/
Paul
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists