[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1210152783.3453.82.camel@ymzhang>
Date: Wed, 07 May 2008 17:33:03 +0800
From: "Zhang, Yanmin" <yanmin_zhang@...ux.intel.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: volanoMark regression with kernel 2.6.26-rc1
On Wed, 2008-05-07 at 11:17 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Zhang, Yanmin <yanmin_zhang@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
>
> > Comparing with 2.6.25, volanoMark has big regression with kernel
> > 2.6.26-rc1. It's about 50% on my 8-core stoakley, 16-core tigerton,
> > and Itanium Montecito.
> >
> > With bisect, I located below patch.
>
> thanks Yanmin, i've queued up your patch that reverts this change.
Sorry. The reverting patch has a comment-out block. I need delete it if you queue the
patch officially.
View attachment "revert_smpnice.patch" of type "text/x-patch" (23096 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists