[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080507173357.GA4424@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 7 May 2008 23:03:57 +0530
From: Dhaval Giani <dhaval@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: "Zhang, Yanmin" <yanmin_zhang@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Aneesh Kumar KV <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: volanoMark regression with kernel 2.6.26-rc1
On Tue, May 06, 2008 at 05:22:07PM +0530, Dhaval Giani wrote:
> On Tue, May 06, 2008 at 10:06:30AM +0800, Zhang, Yanmin wrote:
> > Comparing with 2.6.25, volanoMark has big regression with kernel 2.6.26-rc1.
> > It's about 50% on my 8-core stoakley, 16-core tigerton, and Itanium Montecito.
> >
> > With bisect, I located below patch.
> >
> > 18d95a2832c1392a2d63227a7a6d433cb9f2037e is first bad commit
> > commit 18d95a2832c1392a2d63227a7a6d433cb9f2037e
> > Author: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
> > Date: Sat Apr 19 19:45:00 2008 +0200
> >
> > sched: fair-group: SMP-nice for group scheduling
> >
> > Implement SMP nice support for the full group hierarchy.
> >
> > If I reverse the patch with resolving some conflictions, volanoMark result could
> > be restored completely.
> >
>
> ok, that's bad. Let's get vatsa and Ingo also involved.
>
Just to confirm, do you still have a performance regression with
!group_sched?
--
regards,
Dhaval
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists