[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20080507083835.6ba126e6.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Wed, 7 May 2008 08:38:35 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind@...dex.ru>
Cc: Artem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@...ia.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Adrian Hunter <ext-adrian.hunter@...ia.com>,
Edward Shishkin <edward.shishkin@...il.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH take 2 01/28] VFS: introduce writeback_inodes_sb()
On Wed, 07 May 2008 14:14:41 +0300 Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind@...dex.ru> wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
>
> Andrew Morton wrote:
> > This looks rather similar to
> > http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/mmotm/broken-out/reiser4-sb_sync_inodes.patch
> >
> > Which is best?
>
> Well, this reiser4 patch is basically doing 3 things at once:
> 1. Introduce ->sync_inodes()
> 2. Move spin_lock(&inode_lock);
> 3. Export generic_sync_sb_inodes()
>
> As Christoph suggested, I've attached a patch which just moves the
> spinlock. Could you please consider sending it to Linus or taking into your tree?
I already added gti-ubifs.patch to the -mm lineup. I haven't yet tried
pulling, merging or compiling it.
I'd suggest that you just retain this patch in your tree.
> Should I amend the reiser4 patch correspondingly for you?
That would be nice, if you have time, thanks.
> Also, what do you think about taking UBIFS into your tree?
I take git trees pretty promiscuously, to get them a bit more exposure and
merge/build testing.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists