[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <48231DAF.7070900@garzik.org>
Date: Thu, 08 May 2008 11:35:11 -0400
From: Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
To: Markus Trippelsdorf <markus@...ppelsdorf.de>,
linux-ide@...r.kernel.org
CC: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, htejun@...il.com,
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>, marc.c.dionne@...il.com,
dl9pf@....de, bug-track@...her-privat.net, sitsofe@...oo.com
Subject: [PATCH] Re: [git patches] libata updates - (improve post-reset device
ready test) regression
Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
>> Tejun Heo (12):
>> libata: improve post-reset device ready test
>
> This commit (78ab88f04f44bed566d51dce0c7cbfeff6449a06) causes a long
> boot delay with my onboard Promise controller. It seems like libata
> probes for a nonexisting PATA drive...
>
> ACPI: PCI Interrupt 0000:00:08.0[A] -> GSI 18 (level, low) -> IRQ 18
> scsi0 : sata_promise
> scsi1 : sata_promise
> scsi2 : sata_promise
> ata1: SATA max UDMA/133 mmio m4096@...b600000 port 0xfb600200 irq 18
> ata2: SATA max UDMA/133 mmio m4096@...b600000 port 0xfb600280 irq 18
> ata3: PATA max UDMA/133 mmio m4096@...b600000 port 0xfb600300 irq 18
> ata1: SATA link down (SStatus 0 SControl 300)
> ata2: SATA link up 1.5 Gbps (SStatus 113 SControl 300)
> ata2.00: ATA-7: SAMSUNG HD753LJ, 1AA01109, max UDMA7
> ata2.00: 1465149168 sectors, multi 0: LBA48 NCQ (depth 0/32)
> ata2.00: configured for UDMA/133
> ata3: link is slow to respond, please be patient (ready=0)
> ata3: device not ready (errno=-16), forcing hardreset
> ata3: link is slow to respond, please be patient (ready=0)
> ata3: SRST failed (errno=-16)
> ata3: link is slow to respond, please be patient (ready=0)
> ata3: SRST failed (errno=-16)
> ata3: link is slow to respond, please be patient (ready=0)
> ata3: SRST failed (errno=-16)
> - Last output repeated twice -
> ata3: reset failed, giving up
Does the attached patch fix things?
It basically reverts the patch, while still maintaining the
consolidation. It looks like that status evaluation is not as universal
as believed.
Jeff
View attachment "patch" of type "text/plain" (638 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists