[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <s5hhcd83hor.wl%tiwai@suse.de>
Date: Thu, 08 May 2008 18:05:08 +0200
From: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>
To: Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
Cc: Markus Trippelsdorf <markus@...ppelsdorf.de>,
linux-ide@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, htejun@...il.com,
marc.c.dionne@...il.com, dl9pf@....de, bug-track@...her-privat.net,
sitsofe@...oo.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Re: [git patches] libata updates - (improve post-reset device ready test) regression
At Thu, 08 May 2008 11:35:11 -0400,
Jeff Garzik wrote:
>
> Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
> >> Tejun Heo (12):
> >> libata: improve post-reset device ready test
> >
> > This commit (78ab88f04f44bed566d51dce0c7cbfeff6449a06) causes a long
> > boot delay with my onboard Promise controller. It seems like libata
> > probes for a nonexisting PATA drive...
> >
> > ACPI: PCI Interrupt 0000:00:08.0[A] -> GSI 18 (level, low) -> IRQ 18
> > scsi0 : sata_promise
> > scsi1 : sata_promise
> > scsi2 : sata_promise
> > ata1: SATA max UDMA/133 mmio m4096@...b600000 port 0xfb600200 irq 18
> > ata2: SATA max UDMA/133 mmio m4096@...b600000 port 0xfb600280 irq 18
> > ata3: PATA max UDMA/133 mmio m4096@...b600000 port 0xfb600300 irq 18
> > ata1: SATA link down (SStatus 0 SControl 300)
> > ata2: SATA link up 1.5 Gbps (SStatus 113 SControl 300)
> > ata2.00: ATA-7: SAMSUNG HD753LJ, 1AA01109, max UDMA7
> > ata2.00: 1465149168 sectors, multi 0: LBA48 NCQ (depth 0/32)
> > ata2.00: configured for UDMA/133
> > ata3: link is slow to respond, please be patient (ready=0)
> > ata3: device not ready (errno=-16), forcing hardreset
> > ata3: link is slow to respond, please be patient (ready=0)
> > ata3: SRST failed (errno=-16)
> > ata3: link is slow to respond, please be patient (ready=0)
> > ata3: SRST failed (errno=-16)
> > ata3: link is slow to respond, please be patient (ready=0)
> > ata3: SRST failed (errno=-16)
> > - Last output repeated twice -
> > ata3: reset failed, giving up
>
> Does the attached patch fix things?
>
> It basically reverts the patch, while still maintaining the
> consolidation. It looks like that status evaluation is not as universal
> as believed.
Yes, the patch fixes the problem on my machine.
Thanks,
Takashi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists