linux-kernel - Re: futex: priority wakeup miss ordering

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1210264097.17132.261.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Date:	Thu, 08 May 2008 09:28:17 -0700
From:	Daniel Walker <dwalker@...sta.com>
To:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc:	Pierre Peiffer <peifferp@...il.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: futex: priority wakeup miss ordering


On Thu, 2008-05-08 at 12:06 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:

> IIRC this has been discussed before. The priority ordering of the
> plain mutex waiters is an optimization without guarantees of
> correctness across a priority change. It's simply not worth the
> additional complexity and overhead for that corner case.

I've gotten a number of complains about this .. I think it's assumed
that this feature was implementing posix priority queuing for the
standard futex, but it can't be if there are any miss ordered wakeups.

Daniel

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/