[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200805081823.35696.borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 8 May 2008 18:23:35 +0200
From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>
To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
kvm-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC] stop_machine: make stop_machine_run more virtualization friendly
Am Donnerstag, 8. Mai 2008 schrieb Jeremy Fitzhardinge:
> > Sorry, forgot to mention. Its kvm.git from 2 days ago on s390.
> >
>
> And on s390 cpu_relax yields the vcpu? That's not common behaviour
> across architectures.
Yes, cpu_relax on s390 calls diagnose 44. Diagnose 44 translates to yield on
z/VM and LPAR. Guessing from the number of the diagnose, I think it was used
on z/VM for timeslice yielding long before Linux came to s390.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists