linux-kernel - Re: [stable] [00/12] 2.6.24-stable review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 8 May 2008 10:27:28 -0700
From:	Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...nel.org,
	Darren Salt <linux@...mustbejoking.demon.co.uk>
Subject: Re: [stable] [00/12] 2.6.24-stable review

On Fri, May 02, 2008 at 04:24:31PM +0100, Darren Salt wrote:
> I demand that Greg KH may or may not have written...
> 
> > On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 04:21:44AM +0100, Darren Salt wrote:
> >> I demand that J??rg-Volker Peetz may or may not have written...
> >>> How about this one?
> >>> http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/4/7/55
> >> And this one? http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/3/13/232
> >> (commit 03c086a747d0b242878eb881971ec61c1555869d)
> 
> > Did anyone send it to stable@...nel.org and ask for it to be included?
> 
> I sent it to stable@ when I originally submitted the patch. The message ID is
> <4F84E87BA4%linux@...mustbejoking.demon.co.uk>.

Ok, I see it now.

In it you did not mention if this change was already in Linus's tree,
and if so, what git id it was.  As you sent it primarily to lkml, I
assumed that it was not upstream at this time, hence I did not apply it.

As 2.6.24 is pretty much not being maintained anymore, I don't think
this is an issue anymore :)

thanks,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/