[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1210268432.5061.0.camel@zwerg>
Date: Thu, 08 May 2008 19:40:32 +0200
From: Alexey Fisher <bug-track@...her-privat.net>
To: Markus Trippelsdorf <markus@...ppelsdorf.de>
Cc: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>, Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>,
linux-ide@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, htejun@...il.com,
marc.c.dionne@...il.com, dl9pf@....de, sitsofe@...oo.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Re: [git patches] libata updates - (improve post-reset
device ready test) regression
Am Donnerstag, den 08.05.2008, 18:18 +0200 schrieb Markus Trippelsdorf:
> On Thu, May 08, 2008 at 06:05:08PM +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> > At Thu, 08 May 2008 11:35:11 -0400,
> > Jeff Garzik wrote:
> > >
> > > Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
> > > >> Tejun Heo (12):
> > > >> libata: improve post-reset device ready test
> > > >
> > > > This commit (78ab88f04f44bed566d51dce0c7cbfeff6449a06) causes a long
> > > > boot delay with my onboard Promise controller. It seems like libata
> > > > probes for a nonexisting PATA drive...
> > > >
> > >
> > > Does the attached patch fix things?
> > >
> > > It basically reverts the patch, while still maintaining the
> > > consolidation. It looks like that status evaluation is not as universal
> > > as believed.
> >
> > Yes, the patch fixes the problem on my machine.
> >
>
> Your patch fixes the problem for me, too...
me too :)
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (190 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists