[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0805082014570.22950@blonde.site>
Date: Thu, 8 May 2008 20:21:12 +0100 (BST)
From: Hugh Dickins <hugh@...itas.com>
To: Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
cc: Markus Trippelsdorf <markus@...ppelsdorf.de>,
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>, Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>,
linux-ide@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, htejun@...il.com,
marc.c.dionne@...il.com, dl9pf@....de, bug-track@...her-privat.net,
sitsofe@...oo.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Re: [git patches] libata updates - (improve post-reset
device ready test) regression
On Thu, 8 May 2008, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
> On Thu, May 08, 2008 at 06:05:08PM +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> > At Thu, 08 May 2008 11:35:11 -0400,
> > Jeff Garzik wrote:
> > >
> > > It basically reverts the patch, while still maintaining the
> > > consolidation. It looks like that status evaluation is not as universal
> > > as believed.
> >
> > Yes, the patch fixes the problem on my machine.
>
> Your patch fixes the problem for me, too...
And for me: I was preparing to report when I saw these go by.
A Fujitsu-Siemens laptop and a Fujitsu-Siemens desktop were each taking
70 seconds longer to boot than before. (The status byte was 0x7f.)
Thanks,
Hugh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists