[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080508220348.GD7705@kroah.com>
Date: Thu, 8 May 2008 15:03:48 -0700
From: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To: Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@...ibm.com>
Cc: benh@...nel.crashing.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, tony@...eyournoodle.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Silence 'ignoring return value' warnings in
drivers/video/aty/radeon_base.c
On Thu, May 08, 2008 at 10:36:21AM +0200, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> On Thu, 08 May 2008 17:49:44 +1000,
> Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org> wrote:
>
> >
> > On Thu, 2008-05-08 at 09:34 +0200, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> > >
> > > I was under the impression that failing the initialization was usually
> > > the right thing to do, since we end up with an un-configurable,
> > > un-usable device. But that may be coloured by my experience with s390
> > > devices, where we rely on sysfs attributes extensively. If indeed most
> > > sysfs files are non-vital, removing the __must_check and relying on a
> > > scary warning in the core may be fine. (OTOH, adding checks to the
> > > core
> > > has helped us to find some lurking bugs.)
> >
> > The driver can still fail initialization if it wants... I'm just
> > objecting to the __must_check.
>
> I hear you :) I found it useful, but it seems we should get rid of it
> for _create_file() now.
Why? You point out it found some real bugs, should we just assume that
no new bugs of this same problem will happen again in the future?
thanks,
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists