linux-kernel - Re: [patch 6/6] x86: Add checks for virtual addresses in __phys

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20080510022325.GA25712@uranus.ravnborg.org>
Date:	Sat, 10 May 2008 04:23:25 +0200
From:	Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
To:	Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>
Cc:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	travis@....com
Subject: Re: [patch 6/6] x86: Add checks for virtual addresses in __phys_addr()

On Fri, May 09, 2008 at 07:09:53PM -0700, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> Add checks to insure that virtual addresses are not used in invalid contexts.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>
> 
> ---
>  arch/x86/mm/ioremap.c     |   15 +++++++--------
>  include/asm-x86/page_32.h |    7 ++++++-
>  2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> 
> Index: linux-2.6/arch/x86/mm/ioremap.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.orig/arch/x86/mm/ioremap.c	2008-05-07 16:27:09.792659191 -0700
> +++ linux-2.6/arch/x86/mm/ioremap.c	2008-05-07 19:46:34.733509101 -0700
> @@ -21,29 +21,28 @@
>  #include <asm/pgalloc.h>
>  #include <asm/pat.h>
>  
> -#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
>  
> +#if defined(CONFIG_DEBUG_VM) || defined(CONFIG_X86_64)
>  unsigned long __phys_addr(unsigned long x)
>  {
> +	VM_BUG_ON(is_vmalloc_addr((void *)x));
> +#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
>  	if (x >= __START_KERNEL_map)
>  		return x - __START_KERNEL_map + phys_base;
> +#endif
>  	return x - PAGE_OFFSET;
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(__phys_addr);
> +#endif
>  
>  static inline int phys_addr_valid(unsigned long addr)
>  {
> +#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
>  	return addr < (1UL << boot_cpu_data.x86_phys_bits);
> -}
> -
>  #else
> -
> -static inline int phys_addr_valid(unsigned long addr)
> -{
>  	return 1;
> -}
> -
>  #endif
> +}
>  
>  int page_is_ram(unsigned long pagenr)
>  {
> Index: linux-2.6/include/asm-x86/page_32.h
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.orig/include/asm-x86/page_32.h	2008-05-07 16:27:12.191419001 -0700
> +++ linux-2.6/include/asm-x86/page_32.h	2008-05-07 19:30:46.444980299 -0700
> @@ -64,7 +64,12 @@ typedef struct page *pgtable_t;
>  #endif
>  
>  #ifndef __ASSEMBLY__
> -#define __phys_addr(x)		((x) - PAGE_OFFSET)
> +#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_VM
> +unsigned long __phys_addr(unsigned long x)

Should this have read:
> +extern unsigned long __phys_addr(unsigned long x);
?

Looks like a prototype with a missing ';'.
And x86 uses extern for prototypes in .h files (most of the time).

	Sam
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/