[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200805111057.34790.rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Date: Sun, 11 May 2008 10:57:34 +1000
From: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jon Masters <jonathan@...masters.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] module: don't ignore vermagic string if module doesn't have modversions
On Saturday 10 May 2008 00:44:34 Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Fri, 9 May 2008, Rusty Russell wrote:
> > We should only ignore the start of the vermagic string if the module
> > actually *has* crcs to check. Rather than (say) having an
> > entertaining hissy fit and creating a config option to work around the
> > buggy code.
>
> Btw, this makes the two vesions of "same_magic()" be basically the same
> (since without MODVERSIONS, has_crcs *should* always be zero). Maybe we
> should make it just one version, to simplify logic?
I know, but it's a little subtle.
If the module has an __versions section, yet the kernel was built without
CONFIG_MODVERSIONS, we should not ignore the first part of the version. We
could just #ifdef CONFIG_MODVERSIONS around the verindex initialization tho,
to guarantee that it's 0 for !MODVERSIONS. But that puts YA #ifdef in that
function, and I already itch to clean up the ones there...
Cheers,
Rusty.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists