[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080513153238.GL19717@sgi.com>
Date: Tue, 13 May 2008 10:32:38 -0500
From: Robin Holt <holt@....com>
To: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>
Cc: Robin Holt <holt@....com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@...ranet.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>,
Jack Steiner <steiner@....com>, Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
kvm-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
Kanoj Sarcar <kanojsarcar@...oo.com>,
Roland Dreier <rdreier@...co.com>,
Steve Wise <swise@...ngridcomputing.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Avi Kivity <avi@...ranet.com>,
linux-mm@...ck.org, general@...ts.openfabrics.org,
Hugh Dickins <hugh@...itas.com>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
Anthony Liguori <aliguori@...ibm.com>,
Chris Wright <chrisw@...hat.com>,
Marcelo Tosatti <marcelo@...ck.org>,
Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08 of 11] anon-vma-rwsem
On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 10:06:44PM +1000, Nick Piggin wrote:
> On Thursday 08 May 2008 10:38, Robin Holt wrote:
> > In order to invalidate the remote page table entries, we need to message
> > (uses XPC) to the remote side. The remote side needs to acquire the
> > importing process's mmap_sem and call zap_page_range(). Between the
> > messaging and the acquiring a sleeping lock, I would argue this will
> > require sleeping locks in the path prior to the mmu_notifier invalidate_*
> > callouts().
>
> Why do you need to take mmap_sem in order to shoot down pagetables of
> the process? It would be nice if this can just be done without
> sleeping.
We are trying to shoot down page tables of a different process running
on a different instance of Linux running on Numa-link connected portions
of the same machine.
The messaging is clearly going to require sleeping. Are you suggesting
we need to rework XPC communications to not require sleeping? I think
that is going to be impossible since the transfer engine requires a
sleeping context.
Additionally, the call to zap_page_range expects to have the mmap_sem
held. I suppose we could use something other than zap_page_range and
atomically clear the process page tables. Doing that will not alleviate
the need to sleep for the messaging to the other partitions.
Thanks,
Robin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists