linux-kernel - Re: lxfb driver regression

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20080513093554.64466981.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date:	Tue, 13 May 2008 09:35:54 -0700
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	Andres Salomon <dilinger@...ued.net>,
	Jens Rottmann <JRottmann@...PERT-AT.de>, jordan.crouse@....com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-geode@...badil.infradead.org,
	linux-fbdev-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: lxfb driver regression

On Tue, 13 May 2008 08:48:02 -0700 (PDT) Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:

> 
> 
> On Mon, 12 May 2008, Andres Salomon wrote:
> > 
> > Sorry for the delay, I got around to testing this today.  It works
> > much better on an XO, so I've ack'd it.
> 
> If people expect me to apply that patch, I hope they'll re-send (with acks 
> etc). Otherwise I just expect I'll get it through the normal fbdev queues 
> (which is often Andrew, but shouldn't be).
> 

It got confusing.  Turns out that I had a speculative revert patch,
followed by a new patch with an identical changelog to the first one.

I folded them together and below is what I presently have against
mainline, but I have no changelog describing what it fixes.

Can someone send some text please?

--- a/drivers/video/geode/lxfb_ops.c~fix-lxfb-extend-pll-table-to-support-dotclocks-below-25-mhz
+++ a/drivers/video/geode/lxfb_ops.c
@@ -63,54 +63,32 @@ static const struct {
   { 0x00014284,  19688 },
   { 0x00011104,  20400 },
   { 0x00016363,  23625 },
-  { 0x00015303,  24380 },
   { 0x000031AC,  24923 },
   { 0x0000215D,  25175 },
   { 0x00001087,  27000 },
   { 0x0000216C,  28322 },
   { 0x0000218D,  28560 },
-  { 0x00010041,  29913 },
   { 0x000010C9,  31200 },
   { 0x00003147,  31500 },
-  { 0x000141A1,  32400 },
   { 0x000010A7,  33032 },
-  { 0x00012182,  33375 },
-  { 0x000141B1,  33750 },
   { 0x00002159,  35112 },
   { 0x00004249,  35500 },
   { 0x00000057,  36000 },
-  { 0x000141E1,  37125 },
   { 0x0000219A,  37889 },
   { 0x00002158,  39168 },
   { 0x00000045,  40000 },
-  { 0x000131A1,  40500 },
-  { 0x00010061,  42301 },
   { 0x00000089,  43163 },
-  { 0x00012151,  43875 },
   { 0x000010E7,  44900 },
   { 0x00002136,  45720 },
-  { 0x000152E1,  47250 },
-  { 0x00010071,  48000 },
   { 0x00003207,  49500 },
   { 0x00002187,  50000 },
-  { 0x00014291,  50625 },
-  { 0x00011101,  51188 },
-  { 0x00017481,  54563 },
   { 0x00004286,  56250 },
-  { 0x00014170,  57375 },
-  { 0x00016210,  58500 },
   { 0x000010E5,  60065 },
-  { 0x00013140,  62796 },
   { 0x00004214,  65000 },
-  { 0x00016250,  65250 },
   { 0x00001105,  68179 },
-  { 0x000141C0,  69600 },
-  { 0x00015220,  70160 },
-  { 0x00010050,  72000 },
   { 0x000031E4,  74250 },
   { 0x00003183,  75000 },
   { 0x00004284,  78750 },
-  { 0x00012130,  80052 },
   { 0x00001104,  81600 },
   { 0x00006363,  94500 },
   { 0x00005303,  97520 },
_

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/