[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6599ad830805131427t6ea1fdf3g6772225bb781b0c5@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 13 May 2008 14:27:24 -0700
From: "Paul Menage" <menage@...gle.com>
To: "Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: pj@....com, xemul@...nvz.org, balbir@...ibm.com, serue@...ibm.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH 6/8]: CGroup Files: Remove cpuset_common_file_write()
On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 1:11 PM, Andrew Morton
<akpm@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> On Mon, 12 May 2008 23:37:13 -0700
> menage@...gle.com wrote:
>
> > @@ -1412,14 +1355,18 @@ static struct cftype files[] = {
> > {
> > .name = "cpus",
> > .read = cpuset_common_file_read,
> > - .write = cpuset_common_file_write,
> > + .write_string = update_cpumask,
> > + .max_write_len = (100U + 6 * NR_CPUS),
>
> hm, magic handwavy surely-enough-for-anyone constants.
This is just a movement of the check previously in cpuset_common_file_write():
/* Crude upper limit on largest legitimate cpulist user might write. */
if (nbytes > 100U + 6 * max(NR_CPUS, MAX_NUMNODES))
return -E2BIG;
I'll add more comments. But I think it's a reasonable limit - assuming
that you wastefully enumerate each cpu individually, separated by
commas, 6 * NR_CPUS is enough for 100K CPUs.
Paul
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists