linux-kernel - Re: [RFC/PATCH 4/6] memcg: shmem reclaim helper

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 14 May 2008 16:23:09 +0800
From:	Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com>
To:	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
CC:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
	"balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com" <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	"xemul@...nvz.org" <xemul@...nvz.org>,
	"yamamoto@...inux.co.jp" <yamamoto@...inux.co.jp>,
	"hugh@...itas.com" <hugh@...itas.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH 4/6] memcg: shmem reclaim helper

KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
> On Wed, 14 May 2008 16:15:49 +0800
> Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com> wrote:
> 
>>> +	while(!progress && --retry) {
>>> +		progress = try_to_free_mem_cgroup_pages(mem, gfp_mask);
>>> +	}
>> This is wrong. How about:
>> 	do {
>> 		...
>> 	} while (!progress && --retry);
>>
> Ouch, or retry--....
> 

retry-- is still wrong, because then after while, retry will be -1, and then:

+	if (!retry)
+		return -ENOMEM;

> Thank you for catching.
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/