[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <482AE47F.7080700@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 14 May 2008 09:09:19 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <srostedt@...hat.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC: mingo@...e.hu, acme@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
rostedt@...dmis.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2]: Add sparc64 ftrace support.
David Miller wrote:
> This was a lot more trivial than I expected, about a 20 minute
> hack. Most of the time was spent on test boots :)
Cool! This is what we tried to do with ftrace (make it trivial ;-)
>
> The first patch removes the packed attribute from the ftrace_page
> blob of dynamic ftrace entries, because not only does it cause
> unaligned accesses on sparc64 it's also totally useless.
>
> The second patch adds sparc64 ftrace support.
>
> One thing I noticed is that sparc64 uses an mcount implementation
> already for a quick-and-dirty stack usage checker. I tried to
> make them live alongside eachother.
>
> Next, I think the mcount symbol export needs some tweaking. On sparc,
> the symbol _mcount is what the compiler references (this seems to be a
> sparc sysv4'ism) whereas on x86 it appears that plain "mcount" is
> used. I provide both symbols and we already have a local export of
> "_mcount" to take care of this. I think architectures should deal
> with this symbol exporting since it is different on every system.
No, the same is for PPC (_mcount). I have a port for this ready. I'll
look at your code and compare it with my PPC port.
Ingo, do you think it's time I can hand the PPC stuff over to you? I'll
just have to update it to the lastest linux-ftrace.git.
Thanks,
-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists