linux-kernel - [PATCH] checkpatch: update the 80-char-line check to allow for long strings

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 14 May 2008 00:53:25 -0400
From:	Andres Salomon <dilinger@...ued.net>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Andy Whitcroft <apw@...dowen.org>, mingo@...e.hu,
	rdunlap@...otime.net, jschopp@...tin.ibm.com
Subject: [PATCH] checkpatch: update the 80-char-line check to allow for long
 strings

19:29 * dilinger sends his patch to lkml for a proper flaming
19:32  Quozl> dilinger: it's called "patch hardening"?  ;-}  the heat
              of the flames makes the patch stronger.

I've wasted too much time massaging printk strings in order to satisfy
checkpatch.pl.  Comments on this?

From: Andres Salomon <dilinger@...ian.org>

Checkpatch.pl is pretty strict in its lines-must-be-less-than-80-chars
check.  I consider this a good thing in most scenarios; however,
when it comes to strings, I don't consider the following to be readable:

       printk(KERN_WARNING
                       "one two three "
                       "fooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo\n");

CodingStyle backs me up on this (if I'm interpreting that section clearly).
Ingo[0] has also pointed out why this might be a bad thing as well.

This patch is an attempt to make checkpatch.pl more useful.  Folks ignore
long string warnings[1], which is bad form; we don't _want_ people getting
used to ignoring checkpatch.pl warnings any more than we want people
getting used to ignoring compiler warnings.

The patch updates checkpatch.pl to ignore lines that are > 80 chars
if they contain only (quoted) strings and perhaps some additional stuff
at the end.  For example, the following no longer has warnings emitted:

+ printk(KERN_WARNING
+                       "one two three fooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo\n");

+       printk(KERN_WARNING
+                       "one two three fooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo\n",
+                       xyz);

However, the following still triggers checkpatch.pl warnings:

+ printk(KERN_WARNING "one two three fooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo\n");

+       printk(KERN_WARNING
+                       "one two three foooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo\n", xyz);

I'm sure it's possible to fool the check, but we're not trying to guard
against malicious patch authors.

[0] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/679732/focus=679760
[1] http://lists.laptop.org/pipermail/devel/2008-May/014121.html

Signed-off-by: Andres Salomon <dilinger@...ian.org>
---
 scripts/checkpatch.pl |    2 +-
 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/scripts/checkpatch.pl b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
index b6bbbcd..00f3d05 100755
--- a/scripts/checkpatch.pl
+++ b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
@@ -1117,7 +1117,7 @@ sub process {
 			ERROR("trailing whitespace\n" . $herevet);
 		}
 #80 column limit
-		if ($line =~ /^\+/ && !($prevrawline=~/\/\*\*/) && $length > 80) {
+		if ($line =~ /^\+/ && !($prevrawline=~/\/\*\*/) && !($line =~ /^\+\s*"/ && $line =~ /"[);,\s]*$/) && $length > 80) {
 			WARN("line over 80 characters\n" . $herecurr);
 		}

-- 
1.5.5.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/