[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1210751346.10126.8.camel@twins>
Date: Wed, 14 May 2008 09:49:06 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Andres Salomon <dilinger@...ued.net>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andy Whitcroft <apw@...dowen.org>, mingo@...e.hu,
rdunlap@...otime.net, jschopp@...tin.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] checkpatch: update the 80-char-line check to allow for
long strings
On Wed, 2008-05-14 at 00:53 -0400, Andres Salomon wrote:
> 19:29 * dilinger sends his patch to lkml for a proper flaming
> 19:32 Quozl> dilinger: it's called "patch hardening"? ;-} the heat
> of the flames makes the patch stronger.
>
> I've wasted too much time massaging printk strings in order to satisfy
> checkpatch.pl. Comments on this?
How about treating like its meant to be; as a guide instead of a hard
rule. That means you can ignore it with good taste.. :-)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists