[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <E1JwYLp-0006Fw-ND@pomaz-ex.szeredi.hu>
Date: Thu, 15 May 2008 09:58:09 +0200
From: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>
To: viro@...IV.linux.org.uk
CC: miklos@...redi.hu, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, hch@...radead.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 10/24] vfs: truncate: append-only checking cleanup
> > - error = -EPERM;
> > - if (IS_APPEND(inode))
> > - goto mnt_drop_write_and_out;
> > -
> > error = get_write_access(inode);
> > if (error)
> > goto mnt_drop_write_and_out;
>
> errno change and worse than that - we
> a) get different errno with append-only file mmaped shared
> b) break_lease() happening, despite the file being append-only
>
> > @@ -321,10 +317,6 @@ static long do_sys_ftruncate(unsigned in
> > if (small && length > MAX_NON_LFS)
> > goto out_putf;
> >
> > - error = -EPERM;
> > - if (IS_APPEND(inode))
> > - goto out_putf;
> > -
> > error = locks_verify_truncate(inode, file, length);
>
> Again, errno change...
>
> > @@ -1639,8 +1639,6 @@ int may_open(struct nameidata *nd, int a
> > if (IS_APPEND(inode)) {
> > if ((flag & FMODE_WRITE) && !(flag & O_APPEND))
> > return -EPERM;
> > - if (flag & O_TRUNC)
> > - return -EPERM;
> > }
>
> Bogus break_lease() following that...
>
OK, I'll drop this patch. Truncate is weird, it should really have a
separate i_op/f_op.
Miklos
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists