[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080515120619.6c867bfb@gondolin.boeblingen.de.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 15 May 2008 12:06:19 +0200
From: Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@...ibm.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: shemminger@...tta.com, greg@...ah.com, fubar@...ibm.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, bonding-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] sysfs: remove error messages for -EEXIST case
On Thu, 15 May 2008 03:00:54 -0700 (PDT),
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:
> No, the idea is that the __sysfs_add_one() wouldn't need a parameter
> at all. sysfs_add_one() just needs to check for -EEXIST from
> __sysfs_add_one() to decide whether to warn or not.
But that is what the patch does? Only the upper layers need to pass a
flag around.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists