[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <482C8D4D.3040702@garzik.org>
Date: Thu, 15 May 2008 15:21:49 -0400
From: Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
To: "Kok, Auke" <auke-jan.h.kok@...el.com>
CC: Rick Jones <rick.jones2@...com>,
"Brandeburg, Jesse" <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Chris Peterson <cpeterso@...terso.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drivers/net: remove network drivers' last few uses of
IRQF_SAMPLE_RANDOM
Kok, Auke wrote:
> How about the non-NAPI and non-throttled case? I would argue that without any irq
> mitigation we can still use SA_RANDOM. Many (e.g. embedded) devices will want some
When was the last time we added a new driver for new hardware, and it
didn't support NAPI and/or hw mitigation? They are few and far between,
and getting ever more rare.
> extra form of entropy, and providing them it in this form will be very beneficial
> as these devices more commonly have no other form of entropy anymore.
"no other form of entropy"? See examples in this thread.
Jeff
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists