[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <482D6803.60205@openvz.org>
Date: Fri, 16 May 2008 14:54:59 +0400
From: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...nvz.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
CC: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH] Bsdacct: stir up comments around acct_process.
Fix the one describing what this function is and add one
more - about locking absence around pid namespaces loop.
Signed-off-by: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...nvz.org>
---
diff --git a/kernel/acct.c b/kernel/acct.c
index 0feba97..d7b670c 100644
--- a/kernel/acct.c
+++ b/kernel/acct.c
@@ -657,7 +657,8 @@ static void acct_process_in_ns(struct pid_namespace *ns)
}
/**
- * acct_process - now just a wrapper around do_acct_process
+ * acct_process - now just a wrapper around acct_process_in_ns,
+ * which int turn is a wrapper around do_acct_process.
*
* handles process accounting for an exiting task
*/
@@ -665,6 +666,11 @@ void acct_process(void)
{
struct pid_namespace *ns;
+ /*
+ * This loop is safe lockless, since current it still
+ * alive and holds its namespace, which in turn holds
+ * its parent.
+ */
for (ns = task_active_pid_ns(current); ns != NULL; ns = ns->parent)
acct_process_in_ns(ns);
}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists