[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20080516084840.dfb4cd8d.randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
Date: Fri, 16 May 2008 08:48:40 -0700
From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
To: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...nvz.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Bsdacct: stir up comments around acct_process.
On Fri, 16 May 2008 14:54:59 +0400 Pavel Emelyanov wrote:
> Fix the one describing what this function is and add one
> more - about locking absence around pid namespaces loop.
>
> Signed-off-by: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...nvz.org>
>
> ---
>
> diff --git a/kernel/acct.c b/kernel/acct.c
> index 0feba97..d7b670c 100644
> --- a/kernel/acct.c
> +++ b/kernel/acct.c
> @@ -657,7 +657,8 @@ static void acct_process_in_ns(struct pid_namespace *ns)
> }
>
> /**
> - * acct_process - now just a wrapper around do_acct_process
> + * acct_process - now just a wrapper around acct_process_in_ns,
> + * which int turn is a wrapper around do_acct_process.
in
> *
> * handles process accounting for an exiting task
> */
> @@ -665,6 +666,11 @@ void acct_process(void)
> {
> struct pid_namespace *ns;
>
> + /*
> + * This loop is safe lockless, since current it still
is still
> + * alive and holds its namespace, which in turn holds
> + * its parent.
> + */
> for (ns = task_active_pid_ns(current); ns != NULL; ns = ns->parent)
> acct_process_in_ns(ns);
> }
---
~Randy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists