[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20080515194438.5b609568.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Thu, 15 May 2008 19:44:38 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...nvz.org>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...sign.ru>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/10] Bsdacct: account dying tasks in all relevant
namespaces
On Thu, 15 May 2008 15:11:55 +0400 Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...nvz.org> wrote:
> +/**
> + * acct_process - now just a wrapper around do_acct_process
comment seems wrong.
> + * handles process accounting for an exiting task
> + */
> +void acct_process(void)
> +{
> + struct pid_namespace *ns;
> +
> + for (ns = task_active_pid_ns(current); ns != NULL; ns = ns->parent)
> + acct_process_in_ns(ns);
> +}
Is it really safe to walk this list locklessly?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists