[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LNX.1.10.0805182314450.15590@fbirervta.pbzchgretzou.qr>
Date: Sun, 18 May 2008 23:15:16 +0200 (CEST)
From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...ozas.de>
To: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org>
cc: Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...il.com>, Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>,
Linux kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Michael Buesch <mb@...sch.de>,
Gordon Farquharson <gordonfarquharson@...il.com>
Subject: Re: crossbuild fails in modpost
On Sunday 2008-05-18 22:42, Adrian Bunk wrote:
>> On Thursday 2008-05-15 22:46, Adrian Bunk wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Well, the compiler is the same, but it's told to compile the kernel with
>> >> -m64. It runs on x86_64 kernel and i386 userspace. It's debian i386 gcc
>> >> package which understands x86_64 objects too. No SUBARCH option, it seems
>> >> to default to x86_64.
>> >>...
>> >
>> >Unless you manually fiddle with ARCH you can only build a kernel with
>> >the same 32<->64bit setting as your currently running kernel (no matter
>> >which userspace you use)...
>>
>> echo -en '#!/bin/bash\nexec gcc -m32 "$@"\n' >/usr/local/bin/i386-linux-gcc
>> make CC=i386-linux-gcc
>> then the if($(CC),$(HOSTCC)) check should get true.
>
>No doubt that you can work around the problem.
>
>But that's not a solution.
Of course not. Ever since the arch unification, building for the
other bitness in bi- or multiarch systems has become harder.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists