[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.1.10.0805181108420.18798@apollo.tec.linutronix.de>
Date: Sun, 18 May 2008 11:09:22 +0200 (CEST)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
cc: "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@...ux-mips.org>,
Tom Spink <tspink@...il.com>,
Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...il.com>,
Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] x86: merge nmi_32-64 to nmi.c
On Sun, 18 May 2008, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > Definitely, but we should do it at the Kconfig level which allows us
> > to have integer defines as well, so we end up with something like:
> >
> > static inline unsigned int get_nmi_count(int cpu)
> > {
> > return CONFIG_X86_64 ? cpu_pda(cpu)->__nmi_count : nmi_count(cpu);
> > }
> >
>
> Unfortunately that doesn't work because when CONFIG_X86_64 isn't defined it
> doesn't expand to 0. It would be nice if CONFIG_* expanded to 0/1, but we'd
> need to change all the #ifdef CONFIG_* to #if CONFIG_*...
You can have int type CONFIG_ which is always expanded. We have to add
one of those though.
Thanks,
tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists