[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1211199368.6252.19.camel@johannes.berg>
Date: Mon, 19 May 2008 14:16:08 +0200
From: Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
To: Dan Williams <dcbw@...hat.com>
Cc: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@...tmann.org>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, Jean Tourrilhes <jt@....hp.com>,
linux-wireless <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] make wext wireless bits optional and deprecate them
> Instead of testing for wireless/, best thing would probably be to call
> SIOCGIWRANGE on the device and if it returns EOPNOTSUP then it's not
> wireless. Some drivers may have to load firmware to figure out
> supported rates and encryption capabilities, but to be honest, NM does
> this to detect wireless devices and I haven't run into any issues in 4
> years using it. If there are issues with drivers, then we need to fix
> the driver too.
I was about to propose calling SIOCGIWNAME since that is what
wireless-tools do and that linux/wireless.h indicates.
johannes
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (829 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists