[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4831ECF0.5090101@freescale.com>
Date: Mon, 19 May 2008 16:11:12 -0500
From: Scott Wood <scottwood@...escale.com>
To: Rune Torgersen <runet@...ovsys.com>
CC: linuxppc-dev@...abs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-ide@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Oops with PREEMPT-RT on 2.6.25.4
Rune Torgersen wrote:
> Scott Wood wrote:
>> You're recursively entering lock_timer_base, which does a
>> spin_lock_irqsave(). Either interrupts are enabled when they should
>> not be, or an interrupt was supposed to be threaded that isn't.
>
> Sort of figured. How do I figure out which one, and how to fix it?
Almost certainly the latter. Is the disk interrupt shared with any
other interrupts, that are marked IRQF_NODELAY? The -rt patch doesn't
seem to handle mixing the two well.
Oh, and just to be sure: you do have CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT turned on, and
not just CONFIG_PREEMPT, right? The non-preempt-rt versions in the -rt
patch don't look like they disable interrupts, though I may just be
getting lost in a sea of underscores and ifdefs.
-Scott
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists