linux-kernel - RE: Oops with PREEMPT-RT on 2.6.25.4

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <DCEAAC0833DD314AB0B58112AD99B93B04690239@ismail.innsys.innovsys.com>
Date:	Mon, 19 May 2008 16:16:34 -0500
From:	"Rune Torgersen" <runet@...ovsys.com>
To:	"Scott Wood" <scottwood@...escale.com>
Cc:	<linuxppc-dev@...abs.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-ide@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: Oops with PREEMPT-RT on 2.6.25.4

Scott Wood wrote:
> Almost certainly the latter.  Is the disk interrupt shared with any
> other interrupts, that are marked IRQF_NODELAY?  The -rt
> patch doesn't seem to handle mixing the two well.

Disk is on a muxed PCI interrupt. None of the other interrupts on the
mux is fireing at the time.
Is is possible that the demuxer is not set up right? It is based loosely
on pq2-pci-pic.c

 
> Oh, and just to be sure: you do have CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT turned on, and
> not just CONFIG_PREEMPT, right?  The non-preempt-rt versions in the
-rt
> patch don't look like they disable interrupts, though I may just be
> getting lost in a sea of underscores and ifdefs.

Full CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT. I was actually going to try CONFIG_PREEMPT to
see if anything helped.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/