| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 19 May 2008 18:03:10 -0500 From: Steven French <sfrench@...ibm.com> To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> Cc: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [2.6.27 patch] the scheduled smbfs removal FYI - last week at connectathon I added one patch relating to backlevel support and mapping of open flags on legacy smb open calls (although perhaps some longtime smbfs users would not notice since smbfs did not have this support either). The utimes support for backlevel servers is one obvious thing that I have not added (but smbfs had some limited support for) but was considring adding. Steve French Senior Software Engineer Linux Technology Center - IBM Austin phone: 512-838-2294 email: sfrench at-sign us dot ibm dot com Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> wrote on 05/19/2008 05:32:49 PM: > On Tue, 20 May 2008 00:53:11 +0300 > Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org> wrote: > > > This patch contains the scheduled smbfs removal. > > I don't know how popular this will be right now - quite a few > people needed to be dragged over to cifs up to a month or two > ago. > > I'd suggest that we first use CONFIG_BROKEN or > CONFIG_DIFFICULT_TO_GET_AT and see what the effect of that is. > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists