linux-kernel - Re: [2.6.27 patch] the scheduled smbfs removal

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1211238370.5915.96.camel@brick>
Date:	Mon, 19 May 2008 16:06:10 -0700
From:	Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@...il.com>
To:	Steven French <sfrench@...ibm.com>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [2.6.27 patch] the scheduled smbfs removal

On Mon, 2008-05-19 at 18:03 -0500, Steven French wrote:
> FYI - last week at connectathon I added one patch relating to backlevel 
> support and mapping of open flags on legacy smb open calls (although 
> perhaps some longtime smbfs users would not notice since smbfs did not 
> have this support either).
> 
> The utimes support for backlevel servers is one obvious thing that I have 
> not added (but smbfs had some limited support for) but was considring 
> adding.
> 

Just curious if there was a shortlist somewhere of anything supported in
smbfs but not in cifs?

Harvey

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/