[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.55.0805211007340.31790@cliff.in.clinika.pl>
Date: Wed, 21 May 2008 10:11:36 +0100 (BST)
From: "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@...ux-mips.org>
To: Karel Zak <kzak@...hat.com>
cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
util-linux-ng@...r.kernel.org, Mark.Seger@...com
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] util-linux-ng 2.14-rc3
On Wed, 21 May 2008, Karel Zak wrote:
> > Have you considered adding collectl to util-linux? If so, what was the
> > outcome?
>
> The util-linux is a very basic system package and I'd like to avoid
> dependences on things like Perl.
Does collectl require Perl for building? If it has a run-time dependency
only, then it does not really differ from chkdupexe and it is up to
whoever makes a distribution to partition binary packages in a sensible
way.
Maciej
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists