[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1211361217.6463.61.camel@lappy.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Wed, 21 May 2008 11:13:37 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
To: Christian Kujau <lists@...dbynature.de>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, kanoj@...xen.com
Subject: Re: kswapd busy but not swapping
On Wed, 2008-05-21 at 01:04 +0200, Christian Kujau wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I noticed that the [kswapd0] thread was eating 3-7% cpu time but no
> swapspace has been used yet. This is with a just booted 2.6.25.4 system,
> currently with some disk i/o going on.
>
> So I figured that kswapd might not be responsible for "swapping" after
> all, although the name suggests it. Grep'ing Documentation/ for kswapd did
> not reveal much. Is the paper from Kanoj[0] still valid for 2.6 kernels?
> The SGI page referenced in Documentation/kernel-docs.txt is down, but
> there's a .txt version on [1] which tells me:
>
> "When memory runs low, and a process can not find a free page, it wakes
> up kswapd, the memory stealer"
>
> So, if I'd run low on memory, kswapd would be active. But I don't see that
> in free(1):
>
> # free -m
> total used free shared buffers cached
> Mem: 2023 1662 360 0 820 315
> -/+ buffers/cache: 526 1496
> Swap: 1505 0 1505
It could have been busy reclaiming pagecache.
kswapd is the generic reclaim thread - paging anonymous memory to the
swap is but one form thereof.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists