[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1211393793.7486.15.camel@localhost>
Date: Wed, 21 May 2008 14:16:33 -0400
From: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@....uio.no>
To: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, hch@...radead.org,
viro@...IV.linux.org.uk, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 11/14] vfs: move executable checking into ->permission()
On Wed, 2008-05-21 at 19:15 +0200, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> +/**
> + * exec_permission - check for general execute permission on file
> + * @inode: inode to check access rights for
> + * @mask: right to check for
> + *
> + * Exec permission on a regular file is denied if none of the execute
> + * bits are set.
> + *
> + * This needs to be called by filesystems which define a
> + * ->permission() method, and don't call generic_permission().
> + */
> +int exec_permission(struct inode *inode, int mask)
> +{
> + if ((mask & MAY_EXEC) && S_ISREG(inode->i_mode) &&
> + !(inode->i_mode & S_IXUGO))
> + return -EACCES;
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
Hmm... What if !(mask & MAY_EXEC)? AFAICS, the above will return 0.
A better approach would be to use something like
if (!(mask & MAY_EXEC))
return -EACCES;
if (S_ISREG(inode->i_mode) && !(inode->i_mode & S_IXUGO))
return -EACCES;
return 0;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists