[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <48344E8A.7E42.0086.0@novell.com>
Date: Wed, 21 May 2008 13:32:10 -0600
From: "Leonardo Chiquitto" <lchiquitto@...ell.com>
To: "Alan Stern" <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
"Jiri Kosina" <jkosina@...e.cz>
Cc: "Greg KH" <greg@...ah.com>, "Oliver Neukum" <oliver@...kum.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] USB: fix deadlock in HCD code
>> > > Used in the suspend code. Your patch is indeed correct, but I fear
>> > > there might be a second bug caused by wrong calling conditions.
>> > The problem in the Novell bugzilla entry was caused by the fact that the
>> > OHCI irq routine was invoked with interrupts enabled, owing to a missing
>> > IRQF_DISABLED flag. That bug has already been fixed in 2.6.25.
>>
>> That indeed is 2.6.25 kernel. I guess you are talking about commit
>> 442258e2ff69 here.
>
> Yes.
>
>> If so, the reporter is definitely using the kernel
>> containing this commit, and the lockups still trigger.
>>
>> Seems that my patch is papering over the real bug (someone enabling
>> interrupts somewhere) indeed, but I can't seem to be able to find such
>> codepath.
>
> You could try testing the interrupt-enable flag at various places
> in ohci-hcd (start with finish_urb) and printing an error message if
> interrupts are enabled.
>
> One possibility is that in an earlier call to finish_urb,
> usb_hcd_giveback_urb was called with interrupts disabled and returned
> with interrupts enabled. In other words, some driver's callback
> routine may have enabled interrupts incorrectly.
Alan,
I am trying your suggestion right now. Lets see if it finds something.
Thanks,
Leonardo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists