[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0805211412340.17915@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com>
Date: Wed, 21 May 2008 14:14:45 -0700 (PDT)
From: Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>
To: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mpm@...enic.com, lethal@...ux-sh.org,
dhowells@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH 2/3] SLUB: make ksize() more strict for page allocator
pass-through
On Wed, 21 May 2008, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> Christoph Lameter wrote:
> > Why is it too big? Without your additions it is converting kmallocs inline
> > to get_free_pages(). That results in a simple function call with two
> > constant parameters.
>
> Well, it's a PITA because of #include dependencies in any case. Is moving it
> out-of-line a problem?
>
> Christoph Lameter wrote:
> > The patch touches the page struct uselessly. I think the PageSlab marking is
> > useful for debugging but not for a production kernel.
>
> Hmm, where? page_address() already references ->virtual. I suppose
> CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG is a no no as well then so do we want to add a
> CONFIG_KSIZE_DEBUG config option...? (Btw, I removed the BUG_ON() from kfree()
> as spotted by Vegard Nossum.)
If it has to be then add CONFIG_KSIZE_DEBUG. There are a number of
debugging techniques (kmem_check?) that should not be compiled in. Maybe
add a new config option for those. CONFIG_SLUB_ENABLE_EXPENSIVE_DEBUG?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists