linux-kernel - Re: CFD: linux-wanking@...r.kernel.org (was [PATCH] Standard indentation of arguments)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 21 May 2008 14:12:54 -0700
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Rene Herman <rene.herman@...access.nl>
Cc:	tytso@....edu, viro@...IV.linux.org.uk,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net
Subject: Re: CFD: linux-wanking@...r.kernel.org (was [PATCH] Standard
 indentation of arguments)

On Wed, 21 May 2008 23:08:29 +0200
Rene Herman <rene.herman@...access.nl> wrote:

> I do not for a minute 
> believe that any serious developer is going to shy away from submitting 
> serious code due to an alignment patch getting a cynical slapdown.

Well you should.  One person makes a mistake and gets horridly
treated in public and this will make others fear the consequences of
any mistake they might make.

This could have been handled better, don't you think?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/