| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <4834AD90.8050307@keyaccess.nl> Date: Thu, 22 May 2008 01:17:36 +0200 From: Rene Herman <rene.herman@...access.nl> To: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org> CC: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>, tytso@....edu, hch@...radead.org, viro@...IV.linux.org.uk, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net Subject: Re: CFD: linux-wanking@...r.kernel.org (was [PATCH] Standard indentation of arguments) On 22-05-08 01:01, Adrian Bunk wrote: > Offering any serious mentoring for newbies will only keep developers > busy who could otherwise do things that would bring more value to the > kernel. There is the question of exactly how long you'd like this project to survive though (in a vibrant form). Remarked elsewhere recently that a downside of the new development model seems to be missing opportunity for new editions of books with "all new! covers 2.8!" blurps on the cover. That is, not seeing quality documentation emerge, not seeing mentoring from experienced developers... -- where and how do you want the new developers to come from? If only from business linux as a community thing is as dead as when you'd just close shop. Rene. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists