linux-kernel - Re: CFD: linux-wanking@...r.kernel.org (was [PATCH] Standard indentation of arguments)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20080521233539.GR28946@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Date:	Thu, 22 May 2008 00:35:39 +0100
From:	Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
To:	Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>, tytso@....edu,
	hch@...radead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	davem@...emloft.net
Subject: Re: CFD: linux-wanking@...r.kernel.org (was [PATCH] Standard
	indentation of arguments)

On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 02:01:55AM +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote:

> There are many other open source projects where it might be easier to 
> get started and that are really looking for people wanting to get 
> involved.

*blink*

OK, I give up; how was it supposed to be parsed?  I can't come up with any
way of reading that sentence that would not be an obvious glaring idiocy
and I don't see any obvious typos or word omissions that could have created
that.

Surely you are not saying that we are not really looking for more people
doing useful work?  And doing that without "getting involved"... could
any resident Zen master enlighten me?  I seem to be unable to figure out
how the hell one could pull off such a feat...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/