[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4834B252.1080700@garzik.org>
Date: Wed, 21 May 2008 19:37:54 -0400
From: Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
To: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
alsa-devel@...a-project.org, perex@...ex.cz
Subject: Re: Moving sound/* to drivers/ ?
Takashi Iwai wrote:
> While we are at the issue ALSA HG <-> GIT transition...
>
> One thing that annoys me sometimes is that the sound driver codes are
> on a different subdirectory than other normal drivers, namely under
> /sound. I don't remember exactly why it came there, but this often
> makes people forget to change the necessary code for the sound
> subsystem, or slip from the statistics (I'm not sure whether Linus
> counted sound/* with recent his posts).
>
> If I understand correctly, with git, we can move the files in
> relatively little costs. So, what about moving sound/* back to
> drivers/sound/* or drivers/media/sound/*?
>
> Of course, the primary question is whether it's really worth.
> The obvious drawback is that patches won't be applicable after the
> move. So, if we do it, doing at the last seems practical. But, this
> can be a bit problem with keeping such a change on linux-next until
> the next merge...
>
> And, another question is to where. drivers/sound or
> drivers/media/sound, or whatever.
Speaking as a former OSS driver maintainer, I always preferred
drivers/sound.
Though Rene's suggestion (use both sound/ and drivers/sound/) might make
sense if the subsystem code is huge -- I supported the drivers/block/ ->
block/ code movement for example.
Jeff
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists