[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20080522.112824.103189026.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Thu, 22 May 2008 11:28:24 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: bhutchings@...arflare.com
Cc: jesper@...gh.cc, Matheos.Worku@....COM, yhlu.kernel@...il.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: NIU - Sun Neptune 10g - Transmit timed out reset (2.6.24)
From: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>
Date: Thu, 22 May 2008 19:14:21 +0100
> David Miller wrote:
> > For now, yes. The transmit path itself in the generic network
> > device layer is where the serialization comes from.
>
> This is true in the general case, but can be substantially mitigated
> by segmentation offload. Unfortunately GSO doesn't help much as the
> overhead of allocating the extra skbs is fairly high.
But GSO still does help a lot for chips that lack hw TSO support,
such as NIU, therefore sw GSO support in the NIU driver was pretty
high on my todo list.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists