linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/8] x86: Timer through APIC and related clean-ups

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 22 May 2008 20:29:44 +0200 (CEST)
From:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To:	"Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@...ux-mips.org>
cc:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] x86: Timer through APIC and related clean-ups

On Wed, 21 May 2008, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote:
> Hello,
> 
>  This is a set of patches replacing patch-2.6.26-rc1-20080505-timer_ack-1
> and patch-2.6.26-rc1-20080505-timer-8259-0 sent previously.  The patches
> have been split up into smaller logically self-contained chunks to make
> tracking down problems easier.
> 
>  The patch-2.6.26-rc1-20080505-nosmp-watchdog-0 change fixes a problem
> with timer interrupts getting masked in the 8259A as a result of
> patch-2.6.26-rc1-20080505-timer-8259-6 in the corner-case scenario of
> "nmi_watchdog=1 nosmp" being passed at the command line.
> 
>  As there are some interdependencies the patches are best applied in the 
> order I am sending them; see also the paragraph above.

Looks really good. Applied. Thanks,

	 tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/