| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <48384D13.6010608@scram.de> Date: Sat, 24 May 2008 19:14:59 +0200 From: Jochen Friedrich <jochen@...am.de> To: Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca> CC: David Brownell <david-b@...bell.net>, fabrizio.garetto@...il.com, linuxppc-dev@...abs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, spi-devel-general@...ts.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] spi: Add OF binding support for SPI busses Grant Likely schrieb: > On Sat, May 24, 2008 at 12:26 AM, Grant Likely > <grant.likely@...retlab.ca> wrote: >> On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 8:05 PM, David Brownell <david-b@...bell.net> wrote: >>> On Wednesday 21 May 2008, Anton Vorontsov wrote: >>>>> +++ b/drivers/spi/spi_of.c >>>> I think better placement for this is drivers/of, no? >>> Yes please. >> Okay, I wasn't sure. Will do. > > I'm having second thoughts about this. I think this code is more SPI > centric than it is OF centric. ie. it is usable by all spi masters in > an OF enabled system, but it is not usable by all OF devices in an SPI > enabled system. Or, in other words; it adds OF support to SPI, not > the other way around. I think drivers/spi is the right place for this > to live. Isn't the same true for drivers/of/gpio.c or drivers/of/of_i2c.c, as well? Thanks, Jochen -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists