[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <48385B26.7040509@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 24 May 2008 23:45:02 +0530
From: Abhishek Sagar <sagar.abhishek@...il.com>
To: rostedt@...dmis.org
CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH] ftrace: safe traversal of ftrace_hash hlist
Hi Steven,
I noticed that concurrent instances of ftrace_record_ip() have a race between ftrace_hash list traversal during ftrace_ip_in_hash() (before acquiring ftrace_shutdown_lock) and ftrace_add_hash().If it's so then this should fix it.
Signed-off-by: Abhishek Sagar <sagar.abhishek@...il.com>
---
Accommodate traversal of ftrace_hash hlist with concurrent insertions.
diff --git a/kernel/trace/ftrace.c b/kernel/trace/ftrace.c
index 89bd9a6..bfba25c 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/ftrace.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/ftrace.c
@@ -201,7 +201,7 @@ ftrace_ip_in_hash(unsigned long ip, unsigned long key)
struct hlist_node *t;
int found = 0;
- hlist_for_each_entry(p, t, &ftrace_hash[key], node) {
+ hlist_for_each_entry_rcu(p, t, &ftrace_hash[key], node) {
if (p->ip == ip) {
found = 1;
break;
@@ -214,7 +214,7 @@ ftrace_ip_in_hash(unsigned long ip, unsigned long key)
static inline void
ftrace_add_hash(struct dyn_ftrace *node, unsigned long key)
{
- hlist_add_head(&node->node, &ftrace_hash[key]);
+ hlist_add_head_rcu(&node->node, &ftrace_hash[key]);
}
static void ftrace_free_rec(struct dyn_ftrace *rec)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists