linux-kernel - Re: kernel coding style for if ... else which cross #ifdef

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <48385A76.9020907@zytor.com>
Date:	Sat, 24 May 2008 11:12:06 -0700
From:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To:	Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@...il.com>
CC:	Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>,
	Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>,
	Steve French <smfrench@...il.com>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: kernel coding style for if ... else which cross #ifdef

Vegard Nossum wrote:
> 
> Why not use all-lowercase config_* names? It seems elegant, and fits
> in with the notion that these are to be used not as macros, but as
> ordinary constants.
> 
> (The only disadvantage I can see is that they will stand out less. But
> I don't know how great the disadvantage is.)
> 

I think that would be a massive disadvantage.  Furthermore, they *can* 
(and arguably *should*) still be used for the preprocessor; something like:

#if CFG_BLUTTAN

... at least can be configured to warn on a typo.

	-hpa

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/