[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.1.10.0805250013450.3295@apollo.tec.linutronix.de>
Date: Sun, 25 May 2008 00:22:20 +0200 (CEST)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
cc: "Hans J. Koch" <hjk@...utronix.de>,
Uwe Kleine-K??nig <Uwe.Kleine-Koenig@...i.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Jan Altenberg <jan.altenberg@...utronix.de>,
Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] UIO: Add a write() function to enable/disable
interrupts
On Fri, 23 May 2008, Greg KH wrote:
> On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 01:55:57PM +0200, Hans J. Koch wrote:
> > Sometimes it is necessary to enable/disable the interrupt of a UIO device
> > from the userspace part of the driver. With this patch, the UIO kernel driver
> > can implement an "irqcontrol()" function that does this. Userspace can write
> > an s32 value to /dev/uioX (usually 0 or 1 to turn the irq off or on). The
> > UIO core will then call the driver's irqcontrol function.
>
> Why not just a new sysfs file for the uio device, irq_enabled, or
> something like that? That way our main read/write path is left alone.
It makes a certain amount of sense to use write. You hold the device
file descriptor anyway for the read (wait for interrupt) operation,
so using the same file descriptor is not a too bad idea:
while (!stop) {
/* wait for interrupt */
read(fd);
do_stuff();
/*reenable interrupt */
write(fd);
}
I thought about using a sysfs entry for a while, but looking at the
actual use case made the write() solution a more natural choice.
Thanks,
tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists